MEIO SÉCULO DA CONTROVÉRSIA DO CAPITAL DE CAMBRIDGE

Authors

  • Cláudio Gontijo FEAD MG

    Abstract

    This article seeks to reexamine the apparent logical inconsistencies of neoclassical theory identified during the Cambridge Controversy but later disregarded in the mainstream literature. In this sense, it presents the main problems involved, as well as numerical examples that try to clarify the argument developed. It has, therefore, besides a critical perspective, a propaedeutic function, which seeks to facilitate the understanding of the problematic under examination.

    Author Biography

    • Cláudio Gontijo, FEAD MG
      PhD em Economia pela New School for Social Research; Professor aposentado da UFMG e Professor Adjunto da UFSJ. Trabalha com Economia Internacional; Economia Política; Teoria Econômica; Macroeconomia; Economia Monetária e Financeira e Método (Dialética).

    Published

    2022-09-02

    Issue

    Vol. 31 No. 2 (2022): Economia e Sociedade

    Section

    Articles

    License

    Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. All content of the journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC License.