A Hipótese de Estagnação Secular nas teorias do crescimento econômico
um labirinto de inconsistências teóricas
Abstract
The purpose of these notes is to show that, both in the A.Hansen and in the L.Summers versions, the Secular Stagnation Hypothesis is based on questionable theoretical foundations that seem not to be consistent either with the neoclassical approach to growth nor with the heterodox models of demand led growth. We build from F.Petri´s recent critique of the incoherent use of the neoclassical investment function in situations with persistent labor unemployment. We show that the recent debate is directly connected with the old debate about H.Harrod´s two problems. The analysis allows us to understand some questions related to the current debate, such as the Gordon-Summers polemic on whether the causes of the recent stagnation tendencies in the advanced countries should be attributed to supply or demand factors.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. All content of the journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC License.