About the Journal
Open Science Compliance
ECOS makes all content available in open access, through the SciELO platform, and uses an open license to preserve the integrity of the copyright of articles in an open access environment. Furthermore, the journal follows the Gold Open Access model. |
Publication Ethics
|
ECOS is fully dedicated to adopting best practices regarding ethical conduct associated with the scientific publishing of journals, guided by the COPE code of conduct (Committee on Publication ethics). Editors' responsibilities cover several essential areas:
Turnitin software to identify incorrect citations and potential cases of plagiarism. This instrument analyzes the originality of the manuscript by comparing its content with information available in the program's database and on the internet. If inappropriate practices are suspected, such as plagiarism, self-plagiarism or omission of sources, an identification and resolution process will be initiated to guarantee integrity and ethics in scientific publication. |
|
Focus and Scope
The journal Economia e Sociedade aims to contribute to the development of critical reflection on topics of broad interest in the areas of economic theory, applied economics, history of economic thought and economic history. Since its creation, the journal has welcomed heterodox production inspired, above all, by the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki and Schumpeter, as well as by Latin American reflection on economic development. |
Digital Preservation
This journal follows the standards defined in the SciELO Program's Digital Preservation Policy program . |
Indexing Sources
|
Bibliographical Sheet
|
Websites
EDITORIAL POLICY
Preprints
|
ECOS accepts publishing preprint articles . The use of preprints is an option and choice of the authors. |
|
Peer review process
Articles that pass preliminary consideration will be forwarded to a Responsible Editor who will continue a peer review process (Peer Review) double blind, as follows: the manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers belonging to institutions other than those to which the authors are affiliated, including international institutions. The names and institutions of the authors will not be revealed to reviewers, nor vice versa. Contradictory opinions can be resolved by the Responsible Editor or lead to new consultations with new reviewers. In cases where reviewers request modifications, the journal's editors mediate the dialogue between them and the authors. In all cases, the authors receive the opinions of the reviewers. ECOS utilizes the Open Science Compliance form and within this scope adopts the publication in the final article of the name or names of the editors responsible for the evaluation. The journal annually publishes the name and institutional affiliation of its panel of reviewers .
It is up to the reviewers Take responsibility for the review process, ensuring that the principles of ethics and good research and editorial practices are adopted in the evaluation process; Preserve the confidentiality of the content relating to the evaluations under their responsibility during and after the review process; Quickly carry out the editorial tasks to which they have committed; Inform the editor responsible for the manuscript of any irregularities, suspected bad practices and/or possible conflicts of interest of the authors. Inform the editor responsible for the manuscript if there is or may be a conflict of interest on the part of the reviewer in evaluating the manuscript or circumstances preventing an impartial review of the manuscript. |
Open data
ECOS encourages the open availability of data, codes, methods and other materials used in corresponding repositories. |
Fee Collection
ECOS does not make any charges to authors related to the submission or publication of works. |
Ethics and Misconduct Policy, Errata and Retraction
Bad practices can be defined but not restricted to: fabrication or falsification of data, images or results, plagiarism, omitting conflicts of interest, including authors who have not contributed to the manuscript, omitting authors who have contributed to the manuscript, etc. In case of suspicion of bad practices, the Editorial Board will designate an Evaluation Committee and the following procedures will be applied:
If the bad practice is proven and the severity of the consequences arising from it is assessed, the following procedures may be applied:
|
Conflict of Interest Policy
The conflict of interest may be of a personal, commercial, political, academic or financial nature. Conflicts of interest may occur when authors, reviewers or editors have interests that may influence the preparation or evaluation of manuscripts. When submitting the manuscript, authors are responsible for recognizing and disclosing financial or other conflicts that may have influenced the work. If there is, even potentially, a conflict of interest, the author(s) must inform this in a signed document attached to the submission platform. For more information see : Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities, and Conflicts of Interest . |
Adoption of similarity checking software
To detect incorrect citations and potential cases of plagiarism, the journal uses the Turnitin software , which checks the originality of the manuscript by comparing the content available in the program's database and on the internet. If there is suspicion of plagiarism, self-plagiarism , omission of sources, etc., the process described in the section “Identification and resolution of bad practices” will be initiated. |
Sex and Gender Issues
The editorial team of Economia e Sociedade, in addition to the authors who publish in the journal, must always observe the guidelines on Sex and Gender Equity in Research (Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER). The SAGER guidelines comprise a set of guidelines that guide the reporting of information about sex and gender in study design, data analysis, and results and interpretation of findings. Furthermore, ECOS observes the gender equity policy in the formation of its editorial board. |
Ethics Committee
When an article or research involves procedures involving human beings or sensitive data subject to the LGPD, authors are required to attach a statement of approval from the ethics committee of the institution responsible for validating the research. |
Copyright
The authors of the articles retain the copyright, licensing them under the Creative Commons Attribution BY license, which allows for the reuse and distribution of the articles without restrictions, as long as the original work is properly cited. Reproduction rights are granted to the journal upon signature of a term granting these rights to the article to be published in the journal Economia e Sociedade . Documents and materials made available by authors for public access must comply with the provisions of Law no. 9610, of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian legislation on copyright and provides other measures on the subject (available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9610. htm ). |
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
The journal Economia e Sociedade makes all content available in open access, through the SciELO platform, and uses an open license to preserve the integrity of the copyright of articles in an open access environment. The periodical adopted the Creative license until April/2015 Commons type BY-NC. As of May/2015, the license in use is of the International Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) type. Authors are fully responsible for the content and information presented in their manuscripts. The journal Economia e Sociedade encourages authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts by publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic social media, as well as posting them on their personal social media, provided that the complete citation to the journal's website version is included. |
Sponsors and Development Agencies
Institute of Economics - Unicamp |