Multidimensionality in gender and poverty in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/21gykd53

Keywords:

Poverty, Gender, Inequality, Capability

Abstract

 This paper aims to discuss the importance of multidimensionality in understanding poverty in Porto Alegre, as well as to identify the spatial and gender disparities among its regions. The paper was based on a dataset from a survey conducted in 2007, in a two stage methodology in which 16386 people living in poverty were interviewed. The results enabled the researchers to highlight the importance of dimensions such as habitation, health and education to allow people to “live a “dignified life”. It also shows the differences in deprivations between men and women, the heterogeneity among the Porto Alegre regions and, in particular, the way in which men and women shape their perceptions of poverty and deprivation.

Author Biographies

  • Izete Pengo Bagolin, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

    PhD in Economics from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Professor in the Department of Economics and Coordinator of the Graduate Program in Development Economics at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS – Brazil.

  • Osmar Tomaz de Souza, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

    PhD in Environment and Development from the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR). Professor in the Department of Economics and in the Graduate Program in Economics at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS – Brazil.

  • Flavio V. Comim , University of Cambridge

    PhD in Economics from the University of Cambridge. Professor in the Department of Economics at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and Visiting Professor at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

References

ARAÚJO, Clara; SCALON, Celi (Org.). Gênero, família e trabalho no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da FGV, 2005. CARREIRA, Denise (Coord.). Igualdade de gênero no mundo do trabalho: projetos brasileiros que fazem a diferença. São Paulo: Cortez; Brasília: Fundo de Gênero BrasilCanadá (FIG), 2004. CHIAPPERO MARTINETTI, E. A Multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociallu, v. 108, p. 207-239, 2000. COMIM, F. BAGOLIN, I. Aspectos qualitativos da pobreza no Rio Grande do Sul. Ensaios FEE, Porto Alegre, v. 23, Número Especial, 2002. COMIM, F. Operatiozalizing Sen’s capability approach. Paper presented at Conference Justice and Poverty: examining Sen’s Capability Approach, Cambridge, 5-7 Jun. 2001. DEATON, Angus. The analysis of household surveys: a microeconomic approach to development policy. World Bank Publications, 1997. FOSTER, James; SEN, Amartya. On economic inequality after a quarter century. In: SEN, Amartya. On economic inequality: with a substantial annex after a quarter century by J. Foster & A. Sen. Oxford University Press, 1997. GONÇALVES, Andréa Lisly. História e gênero. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2006. NARAYAN, D. Voices of the poor - Can anyone hear us? Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, Oxford University Press, 2000. NUSSBAUM, M. Sex and social justice. Cambridge: CUP, 1999. NUSSBAUM, M. Woman and human development. Cambridge: CUP, 2000. OBSERVATÓRIO DA CIDADANIA. Observatório da cidadania 2005: rugidos e sussurros. Montevidéu: ITe M – Instituto del Tercer Mundo; Rio de Janeiro: IBASE, 2005. OLINTO, Gilda; OLIVEIRA, Zuleica Lopes Cavalcanti. Gênero e trabalho precário no Brasil urbano: perspectivas de mudança. In: Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais (ABEP), 14, Caxambu (MG), set. 2004. Anais... PRESSMAN, S.; SUMMERFIELD, G. The economic contributions of Amartya Sen. Review of Political Economy. v. 12. n. 1, 2000. QIZILBASH, M. A note on the measurement of poverty and vulnerability in the South Africa context. Journal of International Development, v. 14, p. 757-772, 2002. ROBEYNS, Ingrid. The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, v. 6, n. 1, 2005. ROBEYNS, Ingrid. The capability approach: an interdisciplinary introduction, teaching material for the training course preceding the 3rd International Conference on the capability approach, Pavia, Sept. 2003. SCOTT, Parry; CORDEIRO, Rosineide. (Org.). Agricultura familiar e gênero: práticas, movimentos e políticas públicas. Recife: Ed. Universitária UFPE, 2006. SEN, A. K. Capability and well-being. In: SEN, A.; NUSSBAUN, M. (Ed.). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. SEN, A. K. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1985. SEN, A. K. Desenvolvimento como liberdade. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2000. SEN, A. K. Development as Freedom. Oxford, New York, 1999. SEN, A. K. Development: which way now? The Economic Journal, v. 93, p. 745-762, 1983b. SEN, A. K. Equality of what? In: McMURRIN, S. (Ed.). Tanner lectures on human values.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. SEN, A. K. Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992. SEN, A. K. Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982. SEN, A. K. Resources, values and development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984b. SEN, A. K. The living standard. Oxford Economic Paper, 36, 1984. SEN, A. K. The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. SOCIAL WATCH . Social Watch Report 2007: in dignity and rigths. Montevideo: Instituto del Tercer Mundo, 2007. SMITH, A. Wealth of nations. Campbell and Skninner Edition, v. I, book 2, 1976. STREY, Marlene N.; CABEDA, Sonia T. Lisboa; PREHN, Denise R. (Org.). Gênero e cultura: questões contemporâneas. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2004.

Published

2012-09-27

Issue

Section

Article