THE DEMANDS OF BRAZILIAN FEDERAL UNIVERSITIES FOR THE 2023-2026 QUADRIENNIUM

Authors

  • Luiz Alberto Pilatti Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-9191
  • Caroline Lievore Federal Technological University - Paraná
  • Priscila Rubbo Federal Technological University - Paraná
  • José Roberto Herrera Cantorani Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of São Paulo

Keywords:

Federal Universities, National Association of Directors of Federal Higher Education Institutions (Andifes), Bolsonaro government, Education, Public policy

Abstract

The present study analyzes "Brazilian federal university proposals to candidates for the Presidency of the Republic in 2022", a list of demands developed by the National Association of Directors of Federal Higher Education Institutions (Andifes) considering the actions of the Bolsonaro government from to 2019-2022. This is a qualitative and documentary study. The research corpus was constituted by the referred "Proposals", by Bolsonaro's 2018 Government Plan and by documents from the Transparency Portal. It was found the presence of political and budgetary demands, with emphasis on respect for autonomy, for student assistance, definition of expansion strategies and budget recompositing. It is concluded that the proposals presented by Andifes seek a reversal before the disruptive wave produced in Brazilian education by the Bolsonaro government.

Author Biographies

  • Luiz Alberto Pilatti, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná

    Full Professor at the Federal Technological University - Paraná (UTFPR). He was General Director of the Ponta Grossa Campus (2004-2012), Vice-Rector (2012-2016) and Rector (2016-2020) of UTFPR. PhD in Physical Education from the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP). Master in Education from the Methodist University of Piracicaba (UNIMEP). Graduated in Physical Education from the State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG). He is linked to the Graduate Programs in Production Engineering (PPGEP) and Science and Technology Education (PPGECT) at the Ponta Grossa Campus. Research Productivity Fellow - CNPq.

  • Caroline Lievore, Federal Technological University - Paraná

    PhD and Post-Doctorate in Science and Technology Teaching from the Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR) with a sandwich period at the Polytechnic Institute of Bragança (IPB) in Portugal (2015 - 2019). Graduated in Food Technology from UTFPR (2003), Specialist in Industrial Management (2004) and Master in Production Engineering also from UTFPR (2007). She worked at BRF (Dairy Division) between 2002 and 2014, working in the areas of Production, Quality Assurance and Packaging Research & Development. She has experience in Food Science and Technology, Quality Management and Packaging Development. During her Master's she worked in the research line Knowledge Management and Technological Innovation. At PhD, her research interests involved Teaching and Research in Engineering and Technology, Technological Universities and Polytechnics. She is linked to the research line Technology Education - Teaching in Engineering and Technology and to the research group Organizations and Society (UTFPR).

  • Priscila Rubbo, Federal Technological University - Paraná

    Professor of Accounting Sciences at the Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - Câmpus Pato Branco. PhD in Production Engineering at Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR, Câmpus Ponta Grossa. Master in Production Engineering at the Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR, Câmpus Ponta Grossa. Specialist in Industrial Management: Knowledge and Innovation from the Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR, Câmpus Ponta Grossa. Bachelor in Accounting Sciences from the Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR, Pato Branco Campus.

  • José Roberto Herrera Cantorani, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of São Paulo

    Graduated in Physical Education from the State University of Ponta Grossa - UEPG (2003), Master in Applied Social Sciences from the State University of Ponta Grossa - UEPG (2006). PhD in Physical Education from the State University of Campinas - UNICAMP (2013), with Post-Doctorate in Science and Technology Teaching from the Federal Technological University of Paraná - UTFPR (2015). He is linked to the research groups: Evaluation of quality of life and quality of life at work - UEPG (researcher) and Management of human resources for the productive environment - UTFPR (researcher). Professor at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of São Paulo (IFSP) and permanent faculty member of the Graduate Program in Science and Technology Education (PPGECT) of the Federal Technological University - Paraná (UTFPR).

References

ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIÊNCIAS. Respostas de Jair Bolsonaro à ABC e SBPC. 22 out. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.abc.org.br/2018/10/22/respostas-de-jair-bolsonaro-a-abc-e-sbpc/. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

ALMEIDA, W. M. Sobre o fim da gratuidade do ensino superior público brasileiro. Cadernos de Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 49, n. 173, p. 10-27, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/198053146494. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

AMARAL, N. C. As universidades federais brasileiras sob ataque do governo Bolsonaro. Propuesta Educativa, v. 2, n. 52, p. 127-138, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/4030/403062991011/403062991011.pdf. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

ANDREA, S. Why science's crisis should not become a political battling ground. Futures, v. 104, p. 85-90, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.07.006. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

ANGELO, C. Brazil's government freezes nearly half of its science spending. Nature, v. 568, n. 7751, 155-156, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01079-9. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS DIRIGENTES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES FEDERAIS DE ENSINO SUPERIOR (ANDIFES). Propostas das universidades federais brasileiras aos candidatos e às candidatas à presidência da república em 2022. Brasília: Andifes, 2022. Disponível em: https://ufrj.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/propostas-das-universidades-federais-aos-presidenciaveis-2022.pdf. Acesso em: 09 ago. 2022.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1977.

BOLSONARO, J. M. (2018). O caminho da prosperidade: proposta de plano de governo. Disponível em: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U_KjwjysNcW7gNOwcYhCcaKsz4JGXwbD/view. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Diário Oficial da União: Brasília, DF, p. 1, 5 out. 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

BRASIL. Controladoria-Geral da União. Portal da Transparência. Brasília: CGU, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

BRASIL. Lei no 13.005, de 25 de junho de 2014. Aprova o Plano Nacional de Educação – PNE e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, DF, n. 120-A, p. 1-7, 26 jun. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l13005.htm . Acesso em: 9 ago. 2022.

BRASIL. Ministério da Transparência e Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU). Relatório de Consolidação dos resultados das gestões do Plano Nacional de Assistência Estudantil. Brasília: CGU, 2016. Disponível em: https://auditoria.cgu.gov.br/download/10212.pdf. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

CROSS, D.; THOMSON, S.; SINCLAIR, A. Research in Brazil: A report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. Clarivate Analytics, 2018. Disponível em: https://observatoriodoconhecimento.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/04-Research-in-Brazil.pdf. Acesso em: 6 ago. 2022.

DOĞAN, S.; SELENICA, E. Authoritarianism and academic freedom in neoliberal Turkey. Globalisation, Societies and Education, v. 20, n. 2, p. 163-177, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1899801. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

DÖNMEZ, P. E.; DUMAN, A. Marketisation of academia and authoritarian governments: The cases of Hungary and Turkey in critical perspective. Critical Sociology, v. 47, n. 7-8, p. 1127-1145, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520976780. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

ESCOBAR, H. Fábricas de conhecimento: o que são, como funcionam e para que servem as universidades públicas de pesquisa. Jornal da USP, São Paulo. 5 abr. 2019a. Disponível em: https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/fabricas-de-conhecimento/. Acesso em: 6 ago. 2022.

ESCOBAR, H. We can’t take another hit like this’: Brazilian scientists lament big budget freeze. Science, 8 Apr. 2019b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax6227. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

FERBER, A. L.. “Are you willing to die for this work?” Public targeted online harassment in higher education: SWS presidential address. Gender & Society, v. 32, n. 3, p. 301-320, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218766831. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

FORRAT, N. The political economy of Russian higher education: Why does Putin support research universities? Post-Soviet Affairs, v. 32, n. 4, p. 299-337, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1051749. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

GARNICA, A. V. M. O vazio em tempos trágicos: notas sobre políticas públicas no Brasil atual. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 36, n. 72, p. iv-xx, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v36n72e01. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2022.

GIROUX, H. A. Disposable futures: Neoliberalism's assault on higher education. Límite, v. 11, n. 35, p. 7-17, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/836/83646545001.pdf. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

HOLMWOOD, J.; BHAMBRA, G. K. The attack on education as a social right. South Atlantic Quarterly, v. 111, n. 2, p. 392-401, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1548293. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS. A conta do desmonte: balanço do Orçamento Geral da União 2021. Brasília: INESC, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.inesc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/BalancoOrcamento2021-Inesc-1.pdf. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2022.

LEHER, R. Universidade pública federal brasileira: Future-se e “guerra cultural” como expressões da autocracia burguesa. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 42, e241425, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/ES.241425. Acesso em: 6 ago. 2022.

LOVEDAY, V. ‘Under attack’: Responsibility, crisis and survival anxiety amongst manager-academics in UK universities. Sociological Review, v. 69, n. 5, p. 903-919, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026121999209. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

MANCEBO, D. et al. The work in higher education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, v. 28, n. 6, p. 1-24, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5158. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

MANDELL, A. Tensions within the neoliberal university: sources of change and hope. Critical Policy Studies, v. 12, n. 1, p. 116-120, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1403344. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

MATTOS E SILVA, I. H. “Liberal na economia e conservador nos costumes”: uma totalidade dialética. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo, v. 36, n. 107, e3610702, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/3610702/2021. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

OCHKINA, A. Education as fictitious capital: The crisis of social importance of knowledge. Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, v. 28, n. 6, p. 105-130, 2018. Disponível em: 10.22394/0869-5377-2018-6-105-128. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

ORZECK, R. Academic freedom, intellectual diversity, and the place of politics in geography. Antipode, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1449-1469, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00965.x. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

QUIROGA, F. L. Crítica ao programa Future-se: autonomia como dispositivo de desativação do papel do Estado sobre Institutos e Universidades Federais. Jornal de Políticas Educacionais, Curitiba, v. 14, n. 52, p. 1-16, dez. 2020. Disponível em: http://10.0.21.4/jpe.v14i0.74230. Acesso em: 6 ago. 2022.

RECKTENVALD, M.; MATTEI, L.; PEREIRA, V. A. Avaliando o Programa Nacional de Assistência Estudantil (PNAES) sob a ótica das epistemologias. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, Campinas, Sorocaba, v. 23, n. 2, p. 405-423, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772018000200008. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

REIFF, M. R.. How to pay for public education. Theory and Research in Education, v. 12, n. 1, p. 4-52, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513517344. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

RIEMER, N. Academics, the humanities and the enclosure of knowledge: The worm in the fruit. Australian Universities' Review, v. 58, n. 2, p. 33-41, 2016. Disponível: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1113445.pdf. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2022.

SUKARIEH, M.; TANNOCK, S. Deschooling from above. Race & Class, v. 61, n. 4, p. 68-86, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396819889294. Acesso em: 7 ago. 2022.

Published

2023-07-24

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Artigo

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

A remessa de originais implica a autorização para publicação e disponibilização on-line sem o pagamento de direitos atorais.
A reprodução de artigos publicados na Avaliação só é permitida com indicação da fonte. Utilização de material publicado para fins comerciais é proibida.

How to Cite

THE DEMANDS OF BRAZILIAN FEDERAL UNIVERSITIES FOR THE 2023-2026 QUADRIENNIUM. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, Campinas; Sorocaba, SP, v. 27, n. 3, 2023. Disponível em: https://submission.scielo.br/index.php/aval/article/view/268764. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2025.